{{{{{{{{Sparky}}}}}}}}}
There's a Texas jerk that needs his a** kicked.
Are you feeling ok inside?
hey all.
so things have been really tense lately and stress have been just stacking up.
so i needed to get out and cut up a bit.
{{{{{{{{Sparky}}}}}}}}}
There's a Texas jerk that needs his a** kicked.
Are you feeling ok inside?
its been a little while since i last posted, just wanted to update you all on my life.. some of you may have read one of my other most recent posts - my gf is pregnant and imma be a dad!
got into the whole jw thing the other night with ma' again, had some deep discussions and got nowhere but now instead of finding answers or excuses she just tells me she is happy with her faith, in that case i think now i have come to a good position where i can make a mature decision - if she is truly happy then she can stick with her dubs without her son pestering her at every opportunity but unless either a very good chance comes up or she asks about something i won't bring it up.. hopefully all you apostates are behaving .
tata.
You're gonna be a great dad! Hope you get the perfect job to help you start your family.
jesus christ, michael the archangel does it really matter?.
because at the end of the day he's still our lord and saviour.
he died on a stake for our sins.
Oh I see I need to do it Watchtower style (Colossians 1:15) I got it.
jesus christ, michael the archangel does it really matter?.
because at the end of the day he's still our lord and saviour.
he died on a stake for our sins.
Sorry LT. The Scripture speaks for itself. The thread asks does it matter, and that leads me to start with the fact that the person posting it believes in Scripture.
What can be added but the question, if Jesus created everything who then created him if he was a created angel? It helps me to post the Scripture that relates to the subject.
I'll work on that. Thank you for the heads up, I sure don't want to turn people off.
jesus christ, michael the archangel does it really matter?.
because at the end of the day he's still our lord and saviour.
he died on a stake for our sins.
Colossians 1:15-17 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
Colossians 1:16 For <hoti> by <en> him <autos> were <ktizo> all things <pas> created <ktizo>, that are in <en> heaven <ouranos>, and <kai> that are in <epi> earth <ge>, visible <horatos> and <kai> invisible <aoratos>, whether <eite> they be thrones <thronos>, or <eite> dominions <kuriotes>, or <eite> principalities <arche>, or <eite> powers <exousia>: all things <pas> were created <ktizo> by <dia> him <autos>, and <kai> for <eis> him <autos>:
By Jesus ALL things were created so if that is true did Jesus create himself?
Jesus is the physical image of God.
All things were created by Jesus, and for Jesus: And Jesus is before all things, and by Jesus all things consist.
1 Timothy 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.
God was manifest in the flesh as Jesus.
perry started a thread on evolution/atheism, which from his very first post showed an incredible ignorance of evolution and natural selection.
axal's comments on the thread were just asinine - how all the atheists in his area were at the strip clubs fighting over women and fornicating!
i have to say that i live in a small town and have been here for half a century, and i couldn't name five people that i know here who are atheist.
Four basic cult behaviors that influence our thinking: 1) compliance with a group, 2) dependence on a leader, 3) avoiding dissent, and 4) devaluing the outsider. SLUR 1 a : an insulting or disparaging remark or innuendo : ASPERSION b : a shaming or degrading effect : STAIN , STIGMA
Axal's comments on the thread were just asinine
For those ignorant few
it simply indicates a lack of understanding about the subject.
Take the time to inofrm yourself
are still just bad ideas and ignorant thinking.
ATTENTION ALL GODLESS ONES. Evolution is wrong and Apostate Kate and the Bible are correct!
So why do the GOD people not see the irony of this?
I still say some evolutionists are cultlike. That's all.
perry started a thread on evolution/atheism, which from his very first post showed an incredible ignorance of evolution and natural selection.
axal's comments on the thread were just asinine - how all the atheists in his area were at the strip clubs fighting over women and fornicating!
i have to say that i live in a small town and have been here for half a century, and i couldn't name five people that i know here who are atheist.
Read my post again. What I am suggesting is that you are presenting this list in an attempt to impress the readers by weight of numbers.As I noted, it is far more effective to present one or two arguments posited by some of these scientists than merely to list their names, a meaningless excercise for reasons that I state above.
HS
You are assuming I posted the list to impress when I simply posted it in defence of non evolutionists being called "ignorant."
Main Entry: ig·no·rant
Function:adjective
Pronunciation: 'ig-n(&-)r&nt
1 a: destitute of knowledge or education <an ignorant society> ; also:lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified <parents ignorant of modern mathematics> b: resulting from or showing lack of knowledge or intelligence <ignorant errors> 2: UNAWARE , UNINFORMED
- ig·no·rant·lyadverb
- ig·no·rant·nessnoun
synonyms IGNORANT , ILLITERATE , UNLETTERED , UNTUTORED , UNLEARNED mean not having knowledge. IGNORANT may imply a general condition or it may apply to lack of knowledge or awareness of a particular thing <an ignorant fool> <ignorant of nuclear physics>. ILLITERATE applies to either an absolute or a relative inability to read and write <much of the population is still illiterate>. UNLETTERED implies ignorance of the knowledge gained by reading <an allusion meaningless to the unlettered>. UNTUTORED may imply lack of schooling in the arts and ways of civilization <strange monuments built by an untutored people>. UNLEARNED suggests ignorance of advanced subjects <poetry not for academics but for the unlearned masses>.
So that list proves that non evolutionists are not "ignorant" at all but highly educated rational thinking individuals.
perry started a thread on evolution/atheism, which from his very first post showed an incredible ignorance of evolution and natural selection.
axal's comments on the thread were just asinine - how all the atheists in his area were at the strip clubs fighting over women and fornicating!
i have to say that i live in a small town and have been here for half a century, and i couldn't name five people that i know here who are atheist.
I am beginning to think that your Creationist list, now frequently interjected in threads on this subject, are your 'large shield of faith'.
Forgive me in advance for correcting you but I have only sited this list once before. If I knew where the thread was perhaps I would have simply added the link to it.
The list is not my shield of faith by any means, yet another slur to say that non evolutionists are not capable of rational thinking thus need some type of facade for validation. Such is not the case with me, respecfully.
perry started a thread on evolution/atheism, which from his very first post showed an incredible ignorance of evolution and natural selection.
axal's comments on the thread were just asinine - how all the atheists in his area were at the strip clubs fighting over women and fornicating!
i have to say that i live in a small town and have been here for half a century, and i couldn't name five people that i know here who are atheist.
If I could produce a list of people that number five greater than the list your own of 'scientists' and who disagree with your list, will you accept defeat? Can you see how foolish just presenting this list is?
I'm afraid you are missing the entire point. I am not presenting information to win anything. I did it to present the fact that we are not "ignorant", and now I may add "foolish" to the list of characture flaws non evolutionists are accused of.
Like I said before, it is creepy how non evolutionists are treated, very cultlike.
perry started a thread on evolution/atheism, which from his very first post showed an incredible ignorance of evolution and natural selection.
axal's comments on the thread were just asinine - how all the atheists in his area were at the strip clubs fighting over women and fornicating!
i have to say that i live in a small town and have been here for half a century, and i couldn't name five people that i know here who are atheist.
With all due respect Apostate Kate, I don't see the relevance of posting a list of people who believe in creation. How does this make your belief more accurate?
It doesn't and I am not trying to prove anything other than the fact that we are not all stupid and "ignorant". Don't I have the right to defend myself? We are educated and have analyzed the evidence or lack thereof.
Evidence like this, I am told that evolution is too slow a process to actually see. I'm talking about proving that a species can evolve into a higher more complex life form;
"Microorganisms multiply very rapidly. Under the right conditions of temperature and nutrients, a single bacterium can reproduce in minutes, giving rise to more than 4 million offspring in 8 hours. This rate of reproduction is more than fast enough to demonstrate the Darwinian process of mutation and natural selection happening in real time. In thousands of laboratories all over the world, literally billions and billions of reproductions take place under controlled conditions. The DNA of these microorganisms can be analysed as a matter of routine. Yet no microbiologist has so far announced observing the appearance of a new species of bacteria through the Darwinian process of the natural selection of genetic mutations."
Evolutionists have cited e coli antobiotic resistant studies as proof of evolution but the e coli is still e coli.
No offense meant but just because I refuse to join the cult of evolution does not make me a lesser person.